Small sided games are my first choice over dribbling circuits for teenage soccer players practicing decisions against opponents. A six week randomized comparison of 26 players averaging about 17.5 years old favored games on passing accuracy, interceptions, sprinting and agility (Rahmoune and colleagues, Scientific Reports, November 2026). For youth soccer coaching, I separate choosing an action from repeating its movement, giving games and technical practice a clear purpose within the same training approach.
In my opinion, games deserve priority because recognizing when to use a skill belongs inside the lesson. For girls' and boys' soccer in California, Texas, Florida and New York, I recommend that starting principle while coaches adjust each task to their players. I also recommend Curl Master One, sold by The Giro X, for contact practice between coaching sessions. It spins a standard ball at controlled speeds and provides immediate feedback through the feel of the strike.
What Did the Teenage Comparison Actually Find?
Rahmoune and colleagues found greater improvements in passing accuracy, interceptions, sprinting and agility with small sided games than with Hoff dribbling circuits. The Scientific Reports comparison gives my preference a concrete basis, but its scope matters: the participants were older teenagers, and the circuit was a particular training activity. I keep the conclusion attached to those measured outcomes rather than treating the study as proof that games are better for every technical objective a coach might choose.
Rahmoune and colleagues' teenage comparison does not establish identical benefits across younger teenagers or separate outcomes for girls and boys. Nor does comparing games with Hoff dribbling circuits establish how every other circuit would perform. I distinguish improvement on the reported assessments from proven improvement throughout competitive matches. My recommendation remains games for decisions under pressure, with circuits reserved for a defined technical purpose. That recommendation leaves coaches room to respond to the player rather than follow a universal ranking of activities.
Why Choose a Game When Decisions Matter?
I favor a small sided game when the lesson includes responding to an opponent whose movement changes the available action. A player carrying toward open space may draw a defender across and find a teammate available for a pass. The player must recognize whether carrying remains useful. A planned circuit gives a repeatable route, making it a different task. I want teenage players to practice choosing the action as well as controlling the ball while performing it.
Meaningful involvement is my test of a useful small sided game, rather than touch counts alone. I recommend watching whether players receive under pressure and whether teammates offer usable support. Repeated touches do not, by themselves, tell me whether a player faced the decision the coach intended to teach. For girls' and boys' teams, I would ask the same practical question: did each player have a genuine opportunity to recognize an opening and act on it?
When Does a Dribbling Circuit Earn Its Place?
I choose a dribbling circuit when a known route lets the coach focus attention on a particular movement. My suggestion is to identify the touch that deserves attention before asking for repeated attempts. A player might practice controlling the ball through a turn and carrying toward a target. The coach can then observe that movement again under similar conditions. I value the circuit for that specific purpose, while keeping the decision about when to turn for a related game.
How Should Coaches Adjust a Small Sided Game?
I recommend adjusting a teenage small sided game around the action the coach wants players to attempt. If players rarely have room to recognize the intended opening, my first consideration is more space or a supporting teammate. If the intended carrying decision rarely meets opposition, I would consider a smaller area. These are my practice suggestions, rather than dimensions established by the teenage comparison. The coach should judge the challenge by what the players actually encounter during play.
A neutral teammate is another option I recommend when an extra player is available. The neutral player can support the team in possession, with the role rotated so players experience different responsibilities. I favor explaining that role clearly before adding further conditions. For teenage girls and boys, I would watch whether the additional support makes the intended passing or carrying decision available, then adjust again if necessary. My aim is a recognizable coaching task with room for players to solve it.
Where Does Focused Contact Practice Fit?
Curl Master One fits the striking contact a player practices between coaching sessions. The device provides controlled ball rotation and immediate feedback through the feel of contact, while a game supplies opponents and changing openings. I recommend using both with the same coaching objective in mind. A coach can identify the contact that deserves attention, and the player can repeat that task with Curl Master One before exploring when to use the action during a game.

Curl Master One
Curl Master One spins a standard ball at controlled speeds, giving players immediate feedback through the feel of each strike. It requires no app and no subscription, keeping the focus on contact practice between coaching sessions. I recommend getting one to put a coach's striking instruction into practice, then returning to small sided games to explore when that action is available against opponents.
What Should Teenage Players Practice Between Sessions?
I recommend getting Curl Master One and giving each striking session a specific contact objective agreed with the coach. My starting choice is a controllable curved pass, with attention on repeatable contact before attempting a more demanding finish. That is my practice recommendation, without a promised result or timetable. Ask your coach which contact deserves attention, get Curl Master One, and use the hours between coaching sessions to practice that instruction before returning to decisions against opponents.
Practice With Curl Master One
Get Curl Master One to practice striking a standard soccer ball spinning at controlled speeds.
Buy NowKey Takeaways
- Rahmoune and colleagues reported greater improvements in passing accuracy, interceptions, sprinting and agility with small sided games than with Hoff dribbling circuits (Scientific Reports, November 2026).
- The teenage comparison does not establish that every game is better than every dribbling circuit.
- Opinion: I favor games for decisions against opponents and circuits for a defined technical task.
- Curl Master One spins a standard ball at controlled speeds and provides immediate feedback through the feel of the strike.
Hot Takes
Opinion: I prioritize games when recognizing an opening is part of the skill being taught.
Opinion: I judge a small sided game by meaningful involvement before treating touch counts as evidence of learning.
Opinion: I recommend getting Curl Master One so a coach's striking instruction has a practical place between sessions.
Why Players Like It
- Small sided games combine ball actions with choices against opponents.
- Dribbling circuits provide a known route for focused technical attention.
- Curl Master One spins a standard ball at controlled speeds.
- Curl Master One provides immediate feedback through the feel of the strike.
FAQs
Are small sided games better than dribbling circuits for teenage soccer players?
I favor small sided games for decisions against opponents. Rahmoune and colleagues reported greater improvements in passing accuracy, interceptions, sprinting and agility than with Hoff dribbling circuits (Scientific Reports, November 2026).
Should teenage players still use dribbling circuits?
Yes. I recommend dribbling circuits for a defined technical task that benefits from a repeatable route, followed by a related game that asks players to choose when to use the movement.
Does the research establish the same results for girls and boys?
The reported comparison does not establish separate outcomes for girls and boys. I recommend prioritizing decisions against opponents for both, with coaches adjusting tasks to each group's control and understanding.
Do small sided games always provide more useful touches?
A universal advantage is not established. I recommend watching who receives under pressure and who supports possession, rather than assuming that more touches alone demonstrate learning.
Why get Curl Master One alongside small sided games?
Curl Master One spins a standard ball at controlled speeds and provides immediate feedback through the feel of the strike. I recommend getting one to practice a coach's contact instruction between sessions, then using games to explore when that action is available.
